slow walking jones wrote:
Jim Beisty wrote:
sac wrote:
Ok. This is the dilemma. In my early 20's off a football winter I was running about 30km p/w (sometimes less). Now in my early 30's I'm running about 50-55km/per week.
Give us a break!
That is a ridiculously low kms per week(except perhaps a race week) for an adult with any serious intentions at md.
Get real
30+ year old looking for speed work for 800m, 11 km per day 5 days a week. 13 x 800m per day = 10.4km. Not aiming at the Olympics,
Would you like to give an example of what you would deem appropriate and not so rediculious.
Sure,SWJ.
Firstly,I did not see where Sac said he was "looking for speed work" in his original query?
The whole idea of defining Kms/week requires stating the place of a given week in the training cycle and hence the purpose of the defined kms/week.This can range right across the whole aerobic/anaerobic spectrum over a training/racing period.
Given the time of the year of the post,I took it that Sac's query related to a predominantly aerobic development phase of training aimed at next seasons racing season.In that case,even allowing for his modest 800m aim(based on his previous 400m/1500m times)a minimum of 80-100kms per week would be my "not so ridiculous"aim for him.
The 800m is still heavily dependent on the level of your aerobic development as even the Renshaws of this world eventually discover.Such low levels of kms as mentioned by Sac do not develop it enough.
As a personal anecdote,I ran 1.57 from a 400m pb of 57s and 1500m pb of 4.15, at that time, on predominantly aerobic training of 90-110kms/week for road racing.Based on that and other athlete coaching experiences I would advise a minimum of 80-100 Kms/week(suitably arranged as per Lydiard principles) for the aerobic development training period of any serious runner,which I credit Sac with being.This serves to give a base to allow specific 800m training to commence,when of course kms/week would substantially drop towards the specific race period(s).